W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:fingerprint ?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:30:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFNgM+b6AukfMx8bodvrNZZ5XeUnrpzs_xs6MbYNpgO9sXARHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
On 25 October 2011 20:53, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> On 10/25/11 12:38 PM, Henry Story wrote:
>>
>> On 25 Oct 2011, at 18:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>
>>> Henry,
>>>
>>> Since we have cert:key, what about cert:fingerprint?
>>
>> How would you define it?
>
> Good question since WOT [1] and these newer Key oriented ontologies aren't
> aligned. In addition, WOT is conflating public key and x.509 certificate.

WOT is under-documented, and any progression path will be via merging
things into FOAF or these other vocabs. But I don't believe it
conflates; rather we only handled the PGP use case, didn't get into
x.509 at all.

Dan
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 17:30:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 November 2011 17:30:37 GMT