W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > June 2011

Re: [foaf-protocols] WebID test suite

From: Matt DeMoss <demoss.matt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:55:19 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTikVNQmCfWzSc7A1LvWPN-CZ2FiG=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>, "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Earlier in the thread I half-remembered a SAML profile that seemed to
have something in common with WebID.

This is the profile I was remembering:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/Post2.0/sstc-saml-holder-of-key-browser-sso.html



On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> On 6/28/11 10:39 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
>>
>> do use one of the standard assertion formats. Dont make a custom profile
>> of it. A good test is that if you use openid or ws-fedp that it works with
>> Microsoft ACS as the assertion consuming party. if y ou choose SAML2 (now
>> commodity in windows!), ensure it works with ADFS as the assertion consuming
>> engine. These products (ACS and ADFS) are "final stage" products, way
>> post-research phase, entering the market at the commodization point defined
>> as one that maximizes interoperability. if you can inter with them, you
>> stand a good change of inteworking with the vast majority of other vendor's
>> equivalent implementations.
>
> For us middleware types, pragmatic interop is the name of the game. On our
> part we'll map whatever exists to WebID in order for it to gain traction :-)
>
> We'll take a look at ADFS and SAML2 on Windows re. addition WebID protocol
> bridging. Windows isn't foreign territory to us.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> President&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 22:55:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:24 UTC