W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

Re: a remark on the webid spec

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:09:26 +0100
Cc: "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7954439F-F475-48FB-9EBD-C7E962FC551F@bblfish.net>
To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>

On 12 Dec 2011, at 18:32, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:

> On 12/12/2011 05:45 PM, Henry Story wrote:
>> 
>> On 12 Dec 2011, at 15:24, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> having a look at the WebID spec, I spotted a few mistakes in the RDF/XML
>>> example:
>>> 
>>> * the rdfs namespace is not declared
>>> * the closing tag for rdfs:label misses the leading '/'
>>> * the datatypes xsd:hexBinary and xsd:integer should be expanded URIs,
>>> not CURIEs
>> 
>> very well spotted, Pierre. Thanks a lot. We have updated the spec here
>> 
>>  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/add4f836470d
>> 
>> WE fixed this in today's meeting
>> 
>>   http://www.w3.org/2011/12/12-webid-minutes.html
>> 
>> and we should have a new spec with all the latest changes out today.
>> 
>> Does one really have to use full URLs for datatypes? That's really a bit lame...
> 
> well, unless I missed something the RDF/XML recommendation, I'm pretty
> sure you have to...
> 
> And I agree, it is a bit lame...

That would be one point in favour of using Turtle as the other MUST format, (and drop rdf/xml)
Though we would need quite a few other serious reasons to do something like that.

Henry

> 
>  pa
> 
>> 
>> Henry
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> best
>>> 
>>> pa
>>> 
>> 
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 18:16:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 12 December 2011 18:16:07 GMT