W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

Re: a remark on the webid spec

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:32:26 +0100
Message-ID: <4EE63AAA.10308@liris.cnrs.fr>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 12/12/2011 05:45 PM, Henry Story wrote:
> 
> On 12 Dec 2011, at 15:24, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> having a look at the WebID spec, I spotted a few mistakes in the RDF/XML
>> example:
>>
>> * the rdfs namespace is not declared
>> * the closing tag for rdfs:label misses the leading '/'
>> * the datatypes xsd:hexBinary and xsd:integer should be expanded URIs,
>> not CURIEs
> 
> very well spotted, Pierre. Thanks a lot. We have updated the spec here
> 
>   https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/add4f836470d
> 
> WE fixed this in today's meeting
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2011/12/12-webid-minutes.html
> 
> and we should have a new spec with all the latest changes out today.
> 
> Does one really have to use full URLs for datatypes? That's really a bit lame...

well, unless I missed something the RDF/XML recommendation, I'm pretty
sure you have to...

And I agree, it is a bit lame...

  pa

> 
> Henry
> 
> 
>>
>> best
>>
>>  pa
>>
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 17:35:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 12 December 2011 17:35:36 GMT