- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:32:26 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 12/12/2011 05:45 PM, Henry Story wrote: > > On 12 Dec 2011, at 15:24, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> having a look at the WebID spec, I spotted a few mistakes in the RDF/XML >> example: >> >> * the rdfs namespace is not declared >> * the closing tag for rdfs:label misses the leading '/' >> * the datatypes xsd:hexBinary and xsd:integer should be expanded URIs, >> not CURIEs > > very well spotted, Pierre. Thanks a lot. We have updated the spec here > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/rev/add4f836470d > > WE fixed this in today's meeting > > http://www.w3.org/2011/12/12-webid-minutes.html > > and we should have a new spec with all the latest changes out today. > > Does one really have to use full URLs for datatypes? That's really a bit lame... well, unless I missed something the RDF/XML recommendation, I'm pretty sure you have to... And I agree, it is a bit lame... pa > > Henry > > >> >> best >> >> pa >> > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ >
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 17:35:36 UTC