- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:41:32 -0400
- To: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
- CC: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
> (I generated the page from the second tab of http://x509.me > The test a certificate option. My cert was generated of the first page > (optional). My cert had a SAN pointing to a blank page to start with. > Press the test button on the second tab. It fails as it was a blank > page and spits out the rdfa required for it to pass. Cut, copy, paste.) > I just tested the service above. Results: 1. HTTP scheme WebIDs - Pass 2. Non HTTP scheme WebIDs - Fail . WebID is not about HTTP scheme WebIDs, solely. Courtesy of WWW ubiquity, HTTP scheme WebIDs are a very cost-effective *option*. Important downside: they are unintuitive. Basically, the problem addressed by WebFinger and Fingerpoint. Thus, we must stick to URI scheme agnosticism re WebID verification. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 15:41:57 UTC