W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Fwd: Re: a totally minimal RDFa doc, please

From: Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:51:37 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTik9EmYP5N00pM=7Vt5sfcXNh__aDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
I can create a certificate just fine, but I cannot test it
successfully on your page. I get in an endless loop, getting asked for
a certificate.

Here is my WebID in case you wanted to check:
http://fcns.eu/people/andrei/card#me

Andrei

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
>> (I generated the page from the second tab of http://x509.me
>> The test a certificate option. My cert was generated of the first page
>> (optional). My cert had a SAN pointing to a blank page to start with. Press
>> the test button on the second tab. It fails as it was a blank page and spits
>> out the rdfa required for it to pass. Cut, copy, paste.)
>>
> I just tested the service above.
>
> Results:
>
> 1. HTTP scheme WebIDs - Pass
> 2. Non HTTP scheme WebIDs - Fail .
>
> WebID is not about HTTP scheme WebIDs, solely. Courtesy of WWW ubiquity,
> HTTP scheme WebIDs are a very cost-effective *option*. Important downside:
> they are unintuitive. Basically, the problem addressed by WebFinger and
> Fingerpoint. Thus, we must stick to URI scheme agnosticism re WebID
> verification.
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> President&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 10:13:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:24 UTC