Re: Minutes, Boston f2f meeting 25 - 26 Jan

Hi Kejtil,

Sorry for a slow response.

Until and if we have a full charter, it's hard to respond to this 
properly, but basically, yes, 'we' should certainly make our voice heard 
in this discussion. I guess you'll be active in this space anyway so I'm 
hoping you can carry the torch?

The FOAF 'unstable' classes I think we most need are:

Maker, Agent and Organisation.

Phil.

P.S. No, tracker isn't open to the world - and the WCL-XG's charter runs 
out any day now. For the sake of what may be a few more days, let's hold 
off and see if we can set things up properly under the new system.

Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Monday 29 January 2007 12:55, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Anyway, as to the discussion on using FOAF, we've had a similar
>> debate in ERT WG.
> 
> Danbri has just reopened the FOAF mailing list:
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev
> Perhaps "we" should start a thread there?
> 
> BTW, is the issue tracker open to the world?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Kjetil