RE: Minutes, Boston f2f meeting 25 - 26 Jan

When's the new system starting Phil? 

We appear to have steamed through the XG and now we've hit a brick wall. To
me it almost defeats the purpose of having an XG - i.e. to accelerate the
process.

Cheers
Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-wcl-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-wcl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Phil Archer
Sent: 06 February 2007 09:39
To: Kjetil Kjernsmo
Cc: Shadi Abou-Zahra; public-xg-wcl@w3.org; Dan Brickley; Cedric Kiss
Subject: Re: Minutes, Boston f2f meeting 25 - 26 Jan


Hi Kejtil,

Sorry for a slow response.

Until and if we have a full charter, it's hard to respond to this 
properly, but basically, yes, 'we' should certainly make our voice heard 
in this discussion. I guess you'll be active in this space anyway so I'm 
hoping you can carry the torch?

The FOAF 'unstable' classes I think we most need are:

Maker, Agent and Organisation.

Phil.

P.S. No, tracker isn't open to the world - and the WCL-XG's charter runs 
out any day now. For the sake of what may be a few more days, let's hold 
off and see if we can set things up properly under the new system.

Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Monday 29 January 2007 12:55, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Anyway, as to the discussion on using FOAF, we've had a similar
>> debate in ERT WG.
> 
> Danbri has just reopened the FOAF mailing list:
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev
> Perhaps "we" should start a thread there?
> 
> BTW, is the issue tracker open to the world?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Kjetil



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.27/671 - Release Date: 05/02/2007
16:48

Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 10:56:57 UTC