W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-ssn@w3.org > July 2010

Updated O&M 2.0 definitions

From: <Laurent.Lefort@csiro.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:24:51 +1000
To: <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B484B32EAEABE14AA5409575229CECF30127EF52591D@EXNSW-MBX05.nexus.csiro.au>
Simon, 

I've done a pass on O&M 2.0 and updated http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SWE_terms accordingly.

I still need a definition for Event, ValueThing, Parameter (tricky: it can be used in multiple places) and for quality of observation (also tricky to define). 

Also we need to clarify observationSamplingTime vs.  phenomenaTime.

L.

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Cox [mailto:simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu] 
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2010 2:08 AM
To: Lefort, Laurent (ICT Centre, Acton); public-xg-ssn@w3.org
Subject: RE: Missing definitions 

Laurent - as noted previously, there are textual definitions available for
all the elements of O&M available in ISO/DIS 19156. Some of these are in
the list of definitions in clause 4, and the rest can be clipped from the
normative text in clauses 6-10. 

This standard is now published by ISO (publication date June 4th), and therefore formally citeable. 

Simon

>-- Original Message --
>From: <Laurent.Lefort@csiro.au>
>To: <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
>Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:30:51 +1000
>Subject: Missing definitions 
>
>
>Hi, 
>
>One of the common weaknesses of all the sensor ontologies we reviewed at
>the beginning of the XG was the lack of textual definitions. 
> 
>For our ontology, it is now easier to identify the missing definitions
because
>they will appear as in the documentation page generated out of the OWL
file
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Documentation_Draft (work in
progress)
>
>
>It is easier to use than the OWL file for this purpose because I'm using
>some extra rdfs:seeAlso annotations to separate the different sub-parts.
>The process is not quite fully automated but it is not too painful.
>
>Can you please have a look at the list below and send your suggestions
for
>the definitions which are still missing (either single definitions or terminology
>resources covering what's missing). 
>
>Cheers
>Laurent
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 02:25:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:03:16 UTC