W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-ssn@w3.org > July 2009

Re: SSN-XG Meeting Minutes 15-July-2009

From: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:27:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4A6019DF.2020802@fi.upm.es>
CC: public-xg-ssn@w3.org
On 17/7/09 Holger.Neuhaus@csiro.au wrote:
> Hi all,
> Great discussion! It's almost weekend, so just a few remarks  ;-) 
> I think that we can start off with using sourceforge or similar as 
> repository for our files that everyone has access to (as a "quick" 
> solution, considering the time we have left). However, to some extend 
> I do share Kerry's concern here... Maybe (until we have that license 
> issue figured out) we should even consider a non-public space 
> (probably close enough to have it at SF and not distribute the link  
> ;-) ?

But, then, maybe we don't even need sorceforge right now and we can 
manage putting the files in the wiki.
We can worry about sourceforge when we plan to release a first version 
of the ontology.

> In the meantime, we can look for a repository-based solution.
> I very much prefer the URL 'http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/' 
> for the ontology; I have CVS access to that space (that's how W3C 
> handles it; this way, we get at least that ascii-type of versioning 
> for the 'releases'), so that I'd be happy to do the whole release 
> management-stuff Krzysztof was talking about.

I totally agree in having that URL for the ontology.

it is the approach followed for other ontologies developed in the W3C, 
such as the Delivery Context ontology:
or the same RDF(S) and OWL specifications:

Kind regards,


Dr. Raúl García Castro

Ontology Engineering Group (http://www.oeg-upm.net/)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid
Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
Received on Friday, 17 July 2009 06:28:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:03:15 UTC