Re: Context in the XG?

1) I am versed in creation and articulation of vocabularies, so I 
believe this is something I can provide assistance with if you would like.

2) I believe realm of things social is tied to cultural norms so I 
imagine there are several challenges in teasing out both functionally 
and socially what is going on.

4) I vehemently agree that there are a multitude of complexities in 
defining policies inside of different contexts. I would think that 
someone can not prescribe the policy that should exist but might better 
understand how a given policy implementation interacts with their 
data.My impression is that  obligatory metadata can provide a strategy. 
I am documenting a strategy ATM and will make it available back to the 
group.

For instance, imagine if data providers included a date range of time 
that the information was "good" for. I publish a picture with a lifetime 
of "a week" starting now  1244479801 (epoch time). Data consumers using 
that data outside of its time to life are inherently ignoring the 
implied acceptable use. This is to say that a social networking site 
could through its policies agree to adhere to date range time to life 
metadata. comments?



Venezia Claudio wrote:
> Hi Hakan,
> 
> 2 and 3 were just, overlapping, initial thoughts on the challenges to be faced for exploiting contextual information.
> With respect to this, I was just wondering if mechanisms created for disclosing UAs information to web documents would be still suitable for the future social web application requirements without adjustments,
> 
> I guess you're right the challenge will be facing the outstanding complexity of defining "different privacy policies for different granularities of contexts"...
> 
> Regards
> Claudio
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonsson, Håkan 1 [mailto:Hakan1.Jonsson@sonyericsson.com]
>> Sent: lunedì 8 giugno 2009 12.55
>> To: Venezia Claudio; public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: Context in the XG?
>>
>> Hi Claudio,
>>
>> I agree with your points below. Regarding 1) and 4) I think it is
>> important that users can define different privacy policies for different
>> granularities of contexts.
>>
>> Regarding 2) I am not sure what you mean. Can you please elaborate?
>>
>> /Håkan
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-xg-socialweb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-socialweb-
>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Venezia Claudio
>>> Sent: den 3 juni 2009 15:44
>>> To: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
>>> Subject: Context in the XG?
>>>
>>> I've not received any comment to the mail below so far....
>>> Is there any?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Claudio
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-social-web-talk-request@w3.org [mailto:public-social-web-
>>> talk-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Venezia Claudio
>>> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:56 AM
>>> To: 'Harry Halpin'; Renato Iannella
>>> Cc: public-social-web-talk@w3.org
>>> Subject: RE: Proposal: Keep Group Unified, Don't Divide into Taskforces
>>>
>>> Hi Harry, all,
>>>
>>> as said during the workshop operators would be interested in getting to
>>> a standard definition of social context, as a set of information which
>>> might range from location symbolic names (e.g. home, office,
>>> transportation) and social activity (e.g. business meeting, with
>>> friends) to sensors' related information (e.g. temperature, brightness
>>> and whatever),
>>> this work has been partially carried out within W3C UWA but just with
>>> respect to the delivery context,
>>>
>>> the aim would be collecting use cases, generate requirements (e.g.
>>> functional, security etc) and collect the critical mass to
>>> propose/achieve:
>>>
>>> 1) a social context vocabulary
>>> 2) a definition of Web social context which would extend the web
>>> browsing context
>>> 3) the specification of APIs to get/set social contextual information
>>> 4) a (privacy) security model
>>>
>>> We believe that contextual information will be more and more important
>>> in social networking (especially in mobility) and we'd like to prevent
>>> a massive market fragmentation,
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Claudio
>>>
>>> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle
>>> persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione
>>> derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente
>>> vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete
>>> cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di
>>> provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain
>>> privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only.
>>> Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and
>>> any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
>>>
> 
> 
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
----------------
Ronald P. Reck
Direct Line 	(360) 488-1082

Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 16:56:41 UTC