W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-prov@w3.org > November 2010

Grouping of concepts

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:46:30 +0100
Message-ID: <4CEFC846.3010909@gmail.com>
To: "public-xg-prov@w3.org" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi All,

Thanks for all your contributions to the set of suggested concepts on 
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Proposal_for_a_Working_Group_on_Provenance

I have went ahead and tried grouping those concepts together across the 
various ontologies. You can find this grouping here:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Suggested_Concepts

In this grouping, I have been biased to condensing the concepts to make 
the most manageable list possible. For example, I have grouped all the 
concepts related to time under Time or for example I have grouped 
opm:artifact, provenier;data, and pmlp:document under Resource. I have 
made no distinction between classes and properties. Note, I may have put 
an ontological concept in the wrong grouping but I have not eliminated 
any concepts.

According my grouping that we have roughly 19 core concepts.  Today, on 
the call I hope we can get final consensus on these core concepts 
whether some should be included or not.

Any comments are appreciated. I hope this is helpful.

Speak to you soon,
Paul
Received on Friday, 26 November 2010 14:52:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:00 UTC