Re: Planning a face to face meeting

Hi
+1 for March / W3AC -- never been to one myself, but
(a) it could be a good induction for exactly this reason, and this may 
be true of other who are similarly not familiar with the W3C processes;
(b) ironically, Boston is more easily reachable from the EU than, for 
example, Crete (ESWC in Crete is notoriously expensive to get to and to 
stay at) 
(c) the sooner the better IMO.

--Paolo

Ivan Herman wrote:
> Just a point
>
> Yolanda Gil wrote:
>   
>> From the point of view of the timeline of the group, I think earlier
>> dates would be better.  The timing and location of the W3C AC meeting
>> may be best, and they would have no problem facilitating the logistics
>> (room, cost, telecon line, etc).  Also lots of W3C groups have F2F at
>> these, so it is also useful for synergistic interactions with other W3C
>> groups.  
>>     
>
> That is not necessarily true. We try to get f2f meetings around the ac
> meeting in the fall, ie, on what we call the tpac. But that is not the
> case for the ac meeting in March (although, that is true, the SPARQL WG
> is thinking of having its f2f there, which may lead to a conflict to me,
> personally).
>
> Ivan
>
>   

-- 
Jesus saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups (thanks to whoever came up with this )