W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: "particular uniquely identified resource"

From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:11:51 +0100
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-Id: <76FC999E-330D-4ED8-8756-84F8BB60D6A2@deri.org>
To: Peter Murray <peter.murray@lyrasis.org>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Karen didn't think this looked ambiguous, so I'm leaving this alone for the moment, unless we get other feedback.

-Jodi

On 9 Sep 2011, at 19:32, Peter Murray wrote:

> The "particular uniquely-identified resource" selection makes the most sense to me.
> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jodi Schneider wrote:
>> 
>> I think the phrase "particular uniquely identified resource" might need a comma or hyphen, in order to ensure it's correctly parsed. Thoughts?
>> 
>> In a graph-based architecture, in contrast, an organization can supply individual statements about a resource, and all statements provided about a particular uniquely identified resource can be aggregated into a global graph.
>> 
>> Some possibilities:
>> "particular, uniquely identified resource"
>> "particular uniquely-identified resource"
>> "particular, uniquely-identified resource"
>> 
>> I'm not sure if any of these are clear/prevent misreading. Hopefully somebody else has a sense of that (or will just tell me to be less picky!)
>> 
>> -Jodi
> 
> 
> -- 
> Peter Murray         Peter.Murray@lyrasis.org        tel:+1-678-235-2955                 
> Ass't Director, Technology Services Development   http://dltj.org/about/
> LYRASIS   --    Great Libraries. Strong Communities. Innovative Answers.
> The Disruptive Library Technology Jester                http://dltj.org/ 
> Attrib-Noncomm-Share   http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
> 
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 19:12:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 September 2011 19:12:13 GMT