W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: internal links to the Appendices?

From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:11:20 +0100
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F1109A49-2160-4459-AD79-F7F5AE85071C@deri.org>
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, Peter Murray <peter.murray@lyrasis.org>
Great.

I added  @@@CITE@@@ to the references I spotted:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Scope&diff=6355&oldid=6330

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6357&oldid=6353

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section2&diff=6358&oldid=6354

Likely not comprehensive, but hey, that's what final proofreading will be for!

:) -Jodi

On 9 Sep 2011, at 19:43, Karen Coyle wrote:

> Yes, it will be handy to have those markers.
> kc
> 
> 
> Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>:
> 
>> We refer to the Appendices several times in the main body of the main report. Do we envision having internal links to the Appendices? If so, maybe it's worth adding @@@CITE@@@ text now, so that we find all the places (I recall at least one oblique reference that might not be by name.)
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> -Jodi
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
> 
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 19:11:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 September 2011 19:11:52 GMT