W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > May 2011

RE: Agenda - May 26 2011 - LLD XG telecon - 1000 EDT

From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:01:27 -0400
To: "'Emmanuelle Bermes'" <manue@figoblog.org>
Cc: "'public-xg-lld'" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-ID: <161601cc1bad$67ff79b0$37fe6d10$@gov>
Regrets for both Kevin and me, we just got called to a meeting.  --Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of William Waites
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 9:10 AM
> To: Emmanuelle Bermes
> Cc: public-xg-lld
> Subject: Re: Agenda - May 26 2011 - LLD XG telecon - 1000 EDT
> 
> Regrets from me, unfortunately I won't be able to make it, giving a
> talk on linked data and libraries and such at edina.ac.uk.
> 
> Two things that I would like to raise. To draw attention to the idea of
> "implied datasets" that are a little bit like dark matter I think,
> raised here, but motivated by an observation of the LLD sub-cloud:
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011May/0121.html
> 
> And secondly, working with some collegues on aligning BibJSON
> (basically JSON variant of BibTeX) with JSON-LD, would it be reasonable
> to do this in the context of the reborn LLD community group when this
> happens? If it is reasonable, is there any chance of getting some of
> the basic infrastructure in place (like mercurial repository and such)
> before we actually transition or would this just introduce chaos into
> the whole process?
> 
> Cheers,
> -w
> --
> William Waites                <mailto:ww@styx.org>
> http://river.styx.org/ww/        <sip:ww@styx.org>
> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB  3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:02:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:02:00 GMT