W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > June 2011

review on "Draft Recommendations" and "Benefits"

From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:58:15 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinaD2yNQ-LkGbuz3EuDuBejj7RaJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi all,

Here is Dickson's review on "Draft Recommendations" and "Benefits".

Emmanuelle


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: Dickson and Guenther - request
To: Dr Dickson Lukose <dickson.lukose@mimos.my>
Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Emmanuelle Bermes
<emmanuelle.bermes@bnf.fr>


Hi Dickson,

Thank you for the text!
Am  forwarding to Antoine and Emmanuelle, who can forward to the authors
of that section.

Tom (in a rush, catching a cab to Beijing airport...!)

> Dear Tom,
>
> I read thru the materials on the Draft Recommendation, as well as the section on Benefits.
>
> The only thing I did not see, and may consider it to be of relevance is the following:
>
> "Migrating the Library Data to LOD is only the first stage, since there are considerable initiative among practictioners (especialy institutions like ZBW, Kiel) that are developing framework and technologies to enable the dataset used for experiements reported in a 'paper' is also made availabe as LOD, also the "modal" used by the authors to process the data. With the 'paper', "dataset" and 'model' all represented in LOD (using appropriate vocabuary (and formalisems), researchers arround the world can replicate the experiment conducted by the authors of the paper, as well as utilise the dataset with different 'models'. If this practice is adopted (which I think will take place in the very near future, with varying degree of sophistication from domains to domain), research rigor will excellerate, and overall assessment of research reports outlined in the papers will be transparent, and can be validated by piers."
>
> I don't know if this "point" is of any value, but I thought I will send it to you anyway to determine if it should be indlucded.
>
> DL
>
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 10:58:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 24 June 2011 10:58:43 GMT