W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > June 2011

Re: [UC side deliverable] Status

From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:56:28 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=EZB0=nT-n4g-UYYWtJ-rBRr-a8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Vila <dvila@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
> Aslo, there is still an open question from Jodi regarding the naming of
> Extracted Use cases section:
> "- Consider renaming "Extracted Use Cases" -- this seems, to me, like a
> summary of the clusters
> I would like to get the opinion from the members of the list on this. I am
> not sure what was the rationale behind this name but it is consistent
> accross every cluster page. Do the people like this label or have any other
> idea regarding naming?"
> Any opinions on this? I think that something stating that they are
> generalized scenarios or high-level uses would be a good label.

Good point, Daniel. When we called them "extracted use cases", the
idea was to extract generalized or high-level scenarios from the more
specific use cases that we had gathered in the clusters. So, any of
those names would be good, indeed.

Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 10:56:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:57 UTC