W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Review through a blog?

From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:12 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimQ8HFUE0Qqo++caOTWXPpd78-1hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
I guess the idea is to use a hosted platform, so that we don't have to
set up one. In that case, we should be careful that the platform
doesn't claim IP rights on the content.

Maybe there is someone among our group members who could set up a
wordpress blog quite easily ? If that's the case, we could install
digress.it and we wouldn't have any IP issues.

Emma

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> I'm not sure this would be much simpler than using, say, http://digress.it/
> But I'm ok with whatever anyone can help with, blog or more elaborate
> comment platform...
>
> Antoine
>
>
>> I was thinking something simpler: just putting the sections out on a
>> regular blog and letting people add comments in the normal blog-comments
>> way, without using the WordPress special module. It would be very much like
>> email, except that it would allow anonymous comments, and the comments would
>> be attached to the post with the text.
>>
>> kc
>>
>> Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:
>>
>>> Hi Karen,
>>>
>>> Are you suggesting something different from what we had discussed at
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011May/0051.html?
>>>
>>> In both case, this is a good idea, but we need someone to implement it
>>> :-/
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm still not happy with using email as our review mechanism. Could we
>>>> use (perhaps in addition) a blog for this? We could post the sections and
>>>> people could comment on those sections. This would also allow people to
>>>> comment anonymously, which may be necessary for us to get comments from
>>>> people who have key institutional affiliations.
>>>>
>>>> kc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 10:46:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 15 June 2011 10:46:41 GMT