W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Dickson comments on curriculum

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:08:26 +0200
Message-ID: <4E28792A.8000101@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Hi everyone,

Sorry for the duplication: in fact it has been sent already:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Jun/0085.html
I was confused by the fact it addresses two sections at once...

Antoine


> Time to forward Dickson's comment on the recommendation/curriculum topic. Sorry for the delay, everyone. And thanks Tom for reminding it. And of course to Dickson for spending time reading this section.
>
> The point Dickson felt that we need to make is:
>
> "Migrating the Library Data to LOD is only the first stage, since there are
> considerable initiative among practictioners (especialy institutions like ZBW,
> Kiel) that are developing framework and technologies to enable the dataset used
> for experiements reported in a 'paper' is also made availabe as LOD, also the
> "modal" used by the authors to process the data. With the 'paper', "dataset"
> and 'model' all represented in LOD (using appropriate vocabuary (and
> formalisems), researchers arround the world can replicate the experiment
> conducted by the authors of the paper, as well as utilise the dataset with
> different 'models'. If this practice is adopted (which I think will take place
> in the very near future, with varying degree of sophistication from domains to
> domain), research rigor will excellerate, and overall assessment of research
> reports outlined in the papers will be transparent, and can be validated by
> piers."
>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 19:07:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 21 July 2011 19:07:15 GMT