Re: Dickson comments on curriculum

Hi everyone,

Sorry for the duplication: in fact it has been sent already:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Jun/0085.html
I was confused by the fact it addresses two sections at once...

Antoine


> Time to forward Dickson's comment on the recommendation/curriculum topic. Sorry for the delay, everyone. And thanks Tom for reminding it. And of course to Dickson for spending time reading this section.
>
> The point Dickson felt that we need to make is:
>
> "Migrating the Library Data to LOD is only the first stage, since there are
> considerable initiative among practictioners (especialy institutions like ZBW,
> Kiel) that are developing framework and technologies to enable the dataset used
> for experiements reported in a 'paper' is also made availabe as LOD, also the
> "modal" used by the authors to process the data. With the 'paper', "dataset"
> and 'model' all represented in LOD (using appropriate vocabuary (and
> formalisems), researchers arround the world can replicate the experiment
> conducted by the authors of the paper, as well as utilise the dataset with
> different 'models'. If this practice is adopted (which I think will take place
> in the very near future, with varying degree of sophistication from domains to
> domain), research rigor will excellerate, and overall assessment of research
> reports outlined in the papers will be transparent, and can be validated by
> piers."
>
>