W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > January 2011

Re: No use of PREMIS in the Archives cluster?

From: Manue <manue@figoblog.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:30:06 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimODjedA-yypD8hdQ5hD5SRut1ezwQKxG-XYzSK@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Actually, my UC on "Digital Preservation" mentions "preservation
vocabularies from Library of Congress" but not namely PREMIS. I think we
should add it, taking into account the work that is ongoing in the PREMIS
community (I wasn't aware of this work when I wrote the UC).
We can add it in the UC itself, or in the cluster at least.

Emmanuelle

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote:
> > I know Ed was involved in an effort to express the PREMIS vocabulary
> > in RDF [3] but I do not know the status of that effort or its
> > reception in the PREMIS community.  There is at any rate no mention
> > of RDF on the Wikipedia page for PREMIS [4].
>
> I don't think the PREMIS RDF vocabulary that Rob, John and I worked on
> saw the light of day on the PREMIS discussion list. While I thought it
> was a good start, I wasn't completely happy with the treatment of
> identifiers, and a few other things.
>
> A lot of work has gone into the PREMIS data model (as opposed to a
> particular XML Schema) from a wide variety of folks in the digital
> preservation community. My personal opinion is that an RDF vocabulary
> for PREMIS would be an essential tool for a Linked Data practitioner
> in the digital preservation area.
>
> //Ed
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 07:30:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 January 2011 07:30:42 GMT