W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Role of public-xg-lld and public-lld mailing lists

From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:38:47 -0400
Message-ID: <022001cb0692$315cfa80$18af938c@lib.loc.gov>
To: "Thomas Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de>, "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>, "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>
From: "Thomas Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de>
To: "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>; "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 2:25 PM
Subject: Role of public-xg-lld and public-lld mailing lists

> In short, we stand by our position of using two lists with
> extensive cross-posting.

As I've said I support the two-list system (and perhaps I'm the only one 
other than the Chairs who has said so) but why the "extensive cross 
posting"?  Why not implement the plan (as I suggested) where administrative 
matters are confined to the XG list and all substantive content confined to 
the public list?

Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 22:39:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:54 UTC