W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > July 2010

Re: New Use Case Template and Examples

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:58:32 +0200
Message-ID: <4C407398.9060808@few.vu.nl>
CC: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Kai,


> And of course, I forgot the links...
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Template
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Authority_Data_Enrichment
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Digital_Preservation
>
> Some additional remarks about my wiki changes:
>
> I rearranged the UseCases page a little bit and moved it to Use_Cases:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Cases (UseCases is redirected)
  
> I have copied the contents of Topics3 to Topics and marked Topics3 as
> deprecated.


Thanks for this! Btw, why moving UseCases? Was it a bad page name, wiki-wise?

Best,

Antoine


> Kai Eckert schrieb:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Emmanuelle, Alexander and I finished our work on the redesign of the
>> template based on two example use cases. The template [1], as well as
>> the two use cases [2,3] can be found in the wiki.
>>
>> Beside some minor text clarifications, the main changes are as follows:
>>
>>     * Additional section "Application of linked data": We needed this to
>> separate the linked data specific content from the actual use case
>> scenario. This should encourage contributors to really step back from
>> the possible linked data implementation and think independently about
>> the actual use case.
>>
>>     * We moved the "Existing Work" section upwards, after the
>> "Application of Linked Data" section: This should encourage another
>> abstraction, we want to separate principle linked data solutions from
>> actual solutions that might be used to fulfill the use case.
>>
>> In other words: Application of linked data should *not* describe library
>> domain specific things. Existing work *should* describe library domain
>> specific solutions.
>>
>>     * Additional section "Related Vocabularies": Here we just gather
>> information about vocabularies, which might be valuable for an overall
>> report.
>>
>> The "Problems and Limitations" section should then be used to describe
>> problems on all levels of the former sections: problems with the whole
>> scenario, linked data specific problems, problems with existing works
>> and/or vocabularies.
>>
>>     * The section "Unanticipated Uses" is extended with "Related Use
>> Cases" and can be used to group use cases together, as well as encourage
>> new use cases.
>>
>>     * The Section "Dimensions" is currently called Dimensions / Topics
>> and has been moved to the end of the template: that was already
>> suggested on the mailing list. As a preliminary result: The topics have
>> to be cleaned up to use them for the use cases, they need at least
>> shorter and clearer names and they should not overlap. The dimensions
>> were not sufficient for the Digital Preservation use case and should be
>> extended.
>>
>>     * Additional section "References"
>>
>> Regarding the dimensions/topics, we think that we (the XG, not we three
>> ;-)) should clean them up a little bit and then refine them later as we
>> see the need. At the end of the gathering process, we have to rework the
>> topics and dimensions anyway and make sure that they are in line with
>> the then-available use cases.
>>
>> That's it, now we can continue the discussion about the template.
>>
>> Thanks to Emmanuelle and Alexander, the work with you was very
>> productive and efficient (and pleasant!). And finally, I consider the
>> following actions as DELIVERED, yeah! :-)
>>
>> [NEW] ACTION: Alexander, kai, emma to populate the template for use
>> cases [recorded in
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action03]
>> [NEW] ACTION: stu, alexander, kai and emma to suggest another version of
>> the template. [recorded in
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action05]
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kai
>>
>
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 14:59:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 July 2010 14:59:07 GMT