- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:01:17 -0500
- To: ext Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: ext Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>, olli@pettay.fi, public-webapps@w3.org, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, ext Satish S <satish@google.com>, Peter Beverloo <peter@chromium.org>
On 1/12/12 11:06 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, folks- > > On 1/11/12 9:40 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> On 1/10/12 11:25 AM, ext Glen Shires wrote: >>> Per #4 Testing commitment(s): can you elaborate on what you would like >>> to see at this point? >> >> At this point, I think a `warm fuzzy` like "if/when the spec advances to >> Candidate Recommendation, we will contribute to a test suite that is >> sufficient to exit the CR" would be useful. > > As such, the creation of tests should not be left to CR... Yes, good point Doug. -AB > there should be a plan in place (e.g. a person, and a loose policy, > like "as we implement, we'll make tests and contribute them to the > WG"), and a person responsible for collecting and maintaining the > tests (i.e. making sure that the tests are adapted to meet the > changing spec).
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 17:04:49 UTC