W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-geo@w3.org > April 2007

Re: [georss] GeoRSS meeting review

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:44:08 +0100
Message-ID: <461132D8.5060208@danbri.org>
To: Joshua Lieberman <josh@oklieb.net>
Cc: Mike Liebhold <mnl@well.com>, GeoXG GeoXG <public-xg-geo@w3.org>, georss@lists.eogeo.org

Joshua Lieberman wrote:
> Dan,
> Please give us some feedback on 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/Wiki/Geo_Update so that we can move 
> ahead with this RDF/OWL vocabulary, which matches GeoRSS. There are many 
> aspects of "how" to realize a vocabulary in these languages which are 
> not entirely straightforward to optimize, so input is really needed.

I'll try to take a proper look. First question ... it mentions ISO 19109,

"NeoGeo (proposed) consists of a root property _featureproperty which 
takes as its domain any OWL/RDF class that it makes sense (after ISO 
19109) to cast as a geographic feature."

Is ISO 19109 freely available? If not, could someone summarise? The W3C 
"basic geo" vocab defined a class "spatial thing", which seems to be in 
a similar role. But we didn't go into much detail about what we 
considered that to exactly amount to. Could the domain of 
"featureproperty" be basicgeo:SpatialThing, for example?

I can't currently get to http://mapbureau.com/neogeo/neogeo.owl and the 
host doesn't seem to respond to pings.



Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 16:44:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:43:25 UTC