Dan, Please give us some feedback on http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/ Wiki/Geo_Update so that we can move ahead with this RDF/OWL vocabulary, which matches GeoRSS. There are many aspects of "how" to realize a vocabulary in these languages which are not entirely straightforward to optimize, so input is really needed. Thanks! Josh On Apr 2, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > Mike Liebhold wrote: >> Sounds like a good meeting, I'm glad there's energy here to keep the >> GeoRSS interoperability process moving forward. >> >> There's still a -huge- open issue: >> >> "make[ing] the wording on W3C deprecation stronger" is not >> sufficient to persuade Yahoo and flickr to move millions of users to >> GeoRSS-simple. Without enormous support from W3C forked W3C GeoRSS >> /GeoRSS-simple is fait accompli, permanent. >> >> While the GeoRSS group is working on issues like multipoint and time >> representation and GeoRSS GML/KML forks, I recall the defining >> focus of >> the W3C GeoXG was to settle W3C adoption on GeoRSS-simple, but the >> GeoXG group has so far instead focused on other interesting, but less >> vital topics like GeoSWRL. >> >> I'm wondering what it will take to influence the full W3C >> membership to >> put it's full weight behind GeoRSS interoperability so that Yahoo >> and >> Microsoft and Google don't lead users off into separately geocoded >> universes. > > If you want to keep the SemWeb/RDF folk on board, making sure there is > an RDF representation of whatever comes out of all this is critical. > > The logic behind that, is that geo info is so much more interesting > when > it is mixed with other information not properly considered > geographical. > Info about people, about shops, points of interest, events, history, > music, ...whatever. And W3C's data-mixing framework of choice is RDF. > > Speaking personally..., > > Dan > _______________________________________________ > georss mailing list > georss@lists.eogeo.org > http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georssReceived on Monday, 2 April 2007 13:28:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:18 GMT