- From: Nestor Garay Vitoria <nestor.garay@ehu.es>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 12:45:48 +0200
- To: public-xg-emotion@w3.org
Dear all, We think there are a lot of interesting comments and discussion. We will express now some more comments about those issues. First of all, we think including action tendencies in the mandatory section sounds important. We don't know very much Frijda's reference and we don't know whether there is a limited collection of "typical" kinds of action tendencies expressed there. We agree with Mark in the sense that if there is no such collection, we think it seems difficult adding the basic representation in the mandatory section. With relation to the discussion about the intensity and its scales (class-based approach vs. numerical approach), we wonder if it should be suitable including both of them in the specification and give developers the choice of selecting the most adequate one for their systems. In this case, we are not sure about the need of the mapping between scales. Finally, we think that in the markup language we have to ensure current state of the art. However, we suggest that the language should be flexible enough so that future relevant issues can be considered. What do others think? Thank you for your attention, Idoia Cearreta and Nestor Garay-Vitoria
Received on Sunday, 11 May 2008 10:38:58 UTC