Re: Interop standards relevant for who is doing what where and missing person use-cases

Chamindra
I worked with PFIF a bit, and it was definitely not a standard. it was a
person schema put together on the fly by Zesty and although it did deliver
some useful functionality there were lots of open issues that limited its
usefulness (I can look up the notes if you want)
We RDFize it. (courtesy of peter mika)
So by all means lets include it our list of examples, but I do not think we
should call it a standard :-)
pdm

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Chamindra de Silva
<chamindra@opensource.lk>wrote:

> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Chamindra de Silva
> <chamindra@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > * what standards would be relevant for the 3W and missing person use
> cases - Chamindra
>
> As per my action item I was to open a discussion on what standards are
> _directly_ related to the 3W and missing person use-cases. By this I
> mean those data interop standards that were specifically designed for
> these problem domains. For example People Finder Interchange Format
> (PFIF) was build specifically to handle the missing person use-case.
>
> Please comment on others that are relevant for this and the who is
> doing what where use-case.
>
> Chamindra de Silva
> http://chamindra.googlepages.com
>



-- 
Paola Di Maio,
****************************************