W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-eiif@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Requirement for 3W interop standard

From: Chamindra de Silva <chamindra@opensource.lk>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:13:50 +0530
Message-ID: <20eab7c50808070343t50ce2e99qf23b472ac12b3f30@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mandana Sotoodeh" <mandanas@ece.ubc.ca>
Cc: public-xg-eiif <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
Hi Mandana,

Sorry for my delay sending this. But here is the Sahana schema filtered by
the tables relevant to the Sahana 3W (called Organization Registry in the
system). I attach the well commented SQL script file and I hope this is OK
to work with. If you need to get more information on how the data work in
Sahana I can recommend the demo site at http://demo.sahana.lk. Let me know
if you need it in another format.

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Mandana Sotoodeh <mandanas@ece.ubc.ca>wrote:

>  Paola and all,
>
> Sounds like in OCHA schema, Organization is more of a conceptual entity
> than physical entity (ie physically located). Offices are the ones involved
> directly in the activities and indirectly link OrgPerson to the
> organization. However we should consider the situations where local agencies
> help with response activities, for example, or where volunteers are part of
> the task force. Offices work in general sectors (ie provide general
> services) but they have specific responsibilities in the context of a given
> activities. I agree that some naming don't represent the concepts very
> well. It would be more helpful, if you could be more specific. As we get
> other schemas, we will refine the concepts too.
>
> Regards,
> Mandana
>
>
>
>  *From:* paola.dimaio@gmail.com
> *Sent:* Friday, August 01, 2008 8:03 PM
> *To:* Mandana Sotoodeh <mandanas@ece.ubc.ca>
> *Cc:* public-xg-eiif <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Requirement for 3W interop standard
>
> Mandana, Paolo
>
> Great great thanks for starting this up, it looks like there are some
> conceptual challenges ahead
>
> I am looking at the diagram on the fly (did not study in depth), and have a
> few questions
>
> 1. I can see no link between organisation and orgperson, should there be a
> relationship there? I am not sure if orgperson main relation should be
> office, sound weak
>
> 2. does Location not have any attributes? should there be something written
> in the box
>
> 3. service links to orgperson with relationship -hasobjectives- not sure I
> understand, a few other relations seem brittle
>
> 4. I wonder if there is a rule as to how to name in the singular/plural the
> entities and the relationships and attributes (sing or plu, should be
> constant?), as well as the choice of names for them, if should be made more
> logical and consistent as much as possible
> I wonder if the relationships whould have names more semantically alighed
> with the entities they relate to, less ambiguous kind of thing
>
> will study further
>
> thanks again
>
> best
>
> PDM
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Mandana Sotoodeh <mandanas@ece.ubc.ca>wrote:
>
>>  Hello everyone,
>>
>> Please find the main concepts derived from OCHA schema here:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/eiif/wiki/images/7/71/W3-Model.pdf
>>
>> Renato kindly organized them graphically.
>>
>> Paolo, thank you for providing the documents.
>>
>> Your feedback is appreciated: if you have any specific scenario in
>> mind (in the boundary of W3) that you think the model may not address well;
>> such as volunteers or activities for day to day emergency operations (like
>> drug abuse) as opposed to emergency response (like evacuation), or any
>> suggestions for naming of concepts (ex. office or emergency). As we get
>> other schemas/models, we will revise it accordingly.
>>
>> Thanks very much,
>>
>> Mandana
>>
>>
>>
>>  *From:* Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:29 PM
>>  *To:* public-xg-eiif <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
>> *Cc:* Vincent Lalieu <lalieu@un.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: Requirement for 3W interop standard
>>
>>
>>  On 9 Jul 2008, at 18:46, Paul Currion wrote:
>>
>> The 3W / W3 schema can be found at
>> http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/imtoolbox/02_Standard_Products/01_W3/3W_Tool/3wSchema2_0.pdf
>>
>>
>> Thanks Paul.
>> This is a good opportunity to review the Use Case [1] against the OCHA
>> Schema and determine any gaps.
>> Then look at the outcome and move towards defining the *core8 elements of
>> a W3/3W "standard".
>> Any volunteers to take this on?
>>
>>  Cheers...  Renato Iannella
>> NICTA
>>
>> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/eiif/wiki/WWWWCoord>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Paola Di Maio
> School of IT
> www.mfu.ac.th
> *********************************************
>



Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 10:44:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 October 2008 02:05:11 GMT