W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > June 2008

ACTION-441: 6.4.1 fixes (Re: ACTION-419: Proposed text)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:40:14 +0200
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080606164014.GA37116@iCoaster.does-not-exist.org>

Turns out that this also took care of most of ACTION-441.  Per that
action, I've also changed the "terms of art" text as suggested by
Ian Fette at the meeting.

    <termref def="def-primary-chrome">Primary chrome</termref> error
    messages MUST NOT be phrased solely in terms of art, e.g.,
    jargon.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>






On 2008-06-06 17:05:07 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:05:07 +0200
> Subject: ACTION-419: Proposed text
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 
> Per ACTION-419, I was to rephrase the last pargarph in this section:
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#error-common
> 
> Originally, this was meant as a hook for the chrome and user
> interface best practices; however, the conformance model for the two
> sections is sufficiently different that it doesn't make sense.  I
> therefore propose replacing the current text:
> 
>   The error interactions characterized in this section are intended
>   to communicate security context information, and therefore MUST
>   fulfill relevant requirements in 7.1 Chrome and User Interface
>   Practices.
> 
> ... by a mere reference:
> 
>   The error interactions characterized in this section typically
>   involve communication of security context information. See 7.1
>   Chrome and User Interface Practices for best practices for the
>   presentation of such information.
> 			    	  
> Regards,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 16:40:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 16:40:50 GMT