Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-20

Regrets, at a meeting, and with very shaky connectivity.
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>






On 2008-02-19 17:03:31 -0500, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:03:31 -0500
> Subject: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-20
> List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org designates
> 	128.30.52.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/OF3DA4DB6E.FDBF6905-ON852573F0.004B1BD6-852573F4.00792C2B@LocalDomain>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
> 
>         Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda
> 
> Calling information:
> Wednesday, 20 February 2008
> 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings
> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080220
> 
> 
> Agenda
> 
> 1) Pick a scribe 
> Stephen F is on deck. 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes
> 
> 2) Approve mintues from meetings
> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-wsc-minutes.html
> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-wsc-minutes.html
> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/13-wsc-minutes.html
> 
> 3) Weekly completed action items
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ACTION-361
> Pending review
> review wsc-xit
> Phillip Hallam-Baker
> 2008-02-02
> 
> ACTION-370
> Pending review
> Draft language to reference RFC 3766 or successors in a useful way
> Bill Doyle
> 2008-03-01
> ISSUE-128
> ACTION-382
> Pending review
> Bring up generic techniques for trust root changeover
> Yngve Pettersen
> 2008-02-06
> 
> ACTION-395
> Pending review
> Draft elaborated text to section 9.6 re: synchronization of cues
> Tim Hahn
> 2008-02-20
> 
> 
> 
> 4) Open Action Items
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0028.html
> 
> 5) Action items closed due to inactivity 
> 
> ACTION-343
> Pending review
> Begin examining some of the recommendations, write down the underlying 
> assumptions for success, then list any prior studies that have already 
> examined those assumptions, and possibly how to test the untested 
> assumptions
> Serge Egelman
> 2008-01-29
> User Studies
> 
> 
> 6) Agenda bashing
> 
> 7) Continue discussions of what in xit can go to LC in June
> Need to discuss:
> 
> Section 9.6
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#audio-logotype-practices
> 
> Section 10
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-modes
> 
> 8) Low fi prototyping of security confidence estimate
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score
> There seemed to be general agreement that we would not go to LC with 
> anything that was not at least lo fi prototyped (unless it was the sort of 
> robustness recommendation where only lack of compliance could be 
> prototyped). Working through the prototyping of SCE in a meeting seemed to 
> be the only possibility for it to make it to LC in June. 
> 
> 9) Next meeting - 27 February 2008
> I don't expect us to finish what's on this agenda; I expect we'll take up 
> where we leave off. Though we made great progress last week. If we do, it 
> will be time to get through Issues in the parts going to LC in June. 
>

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 22:11:02 UTC