W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-20

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:03:31 -0500
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF3DA4DB6E.FDBF6905-ON852573F0.004B1BD6-852573F4.00792C2B@LocalDomain>
        Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda

Calling information:
Wednesday, 20 February 2008
11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings
http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080220


Agenda

1) Pick a scribe 
Stephen F is on deck. 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes

2) Approve mintues from meetings
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-wsc-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-wsc-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/13-wsc-minutes.html

3) Weekly completed action items







ACTION-361
Pending review
review wsc-xit
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2008-02-02

ACTION-370
Pending review
Draft language to reference RFC 3766 or successors in a useful way
Bill Doyle
2008-03-01
ISSUE-128
ACTION-382
Pending review
Bring up generic techniques for trust root changeover
Yngve Pettersen
2008-02-06

ACTION-395
Pending review
Draft elaborated text to section 9.6 re: synchronization of cues
Tim Hahn
2008-02-20



4) Open Action Items
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0028.html

5) Action items closed due to inactivity 

ACTION-343
Pending review
Begin examining some of the recommendations, write down the underlying 
assumptions for success, then list any prior studies that have already 
examined those assumptions, and possibly how to test the untested 
assumptions
Serge Egelman
2008-01-29
User Studies


6) Agenda bashing

7) Continue discussions of what in xit can go to LC in June
Need to discuss:

Section 9.6
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#audio-logotype-practices

Section 10
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-modes

8) Low fi prototyping of security confidence estimate
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score
There seemed to be general agreement that we would not go to LC with 
anything that was not at least lo fi prototyped (unless it was the sort of 
robustness recommendation where only lack of compliance could be 
prototyped). Working through the prototyping of SCE in a meeting seemed to 
be the only possibility for it to make it to LC in June. 

9) Next meeting - 27 February 2008
I don't expect us to finish what's on this agenda; I expect we'll take up 
where we leave off. Though we made great progress last week. If we do, it 
will be time to get through Issues in the parts going to LC in June. 
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:03:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:03:48 GMT