W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting 2007-07-18

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:21:23 +0200
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070717162123.GR31669@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

On 2007-07-17 17:36:47 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:36:47 +0200
> Subject: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting 2007-07-18
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
> 
> (In the interest of time, there's no list of closed action items in
> this agenda.  I'll either send a revised version later / early
> tomorrow, or let MEZ catch that particular slack at the next
> meeting.)
> 
> 
> Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda
> 
> Calling information:

Wednesday, 18 July, of course...

> 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings
> 
> Chair pro tempore: Thomas
> Regrets: MEZ
> 
> Agenda
> 
> 1. Administrivia; pick scribe
>    http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing
> 
> 
> 2. Approve mintues from last meeting
>    http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-wsc-minutes
> 
> 
> 3. Agenda bashing
> 
> 
> 4. wsc-usecases progress toward last call
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/wsc-usecases/
> 
>    Editor's report: Tyler, what has happened recently?
> 
>    What's the current state of section 7?
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0071.html
> 
> 
>    ISSUE-6 looks ripe; see latest messages linked from here:
>    http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/6
> 
> 
>    ISSUE-38 has a proposal from MEZ and no objections. 
>    
>    PROPOSED to adopt the text and close the issue:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0153.html
> 
> 
>    Proposal to close 11 issues; paging von Niman and Yonaitis
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0212.html
>    
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-78: Definitions
>      PROPOSED: to reassign this issue to the rec-track deliverables.
> 
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-79: Understandability of security settings
>      PROPOSED: to close without changing Note text.
>      
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-80: Non-visual (multiomodal) presentation
>        of security information
>      PROPOSED: to close unless there's a concrete proposal for change
>        of the Note.
>        
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-81: Mobile Web in Scope 
>      PROPOSED: to close without change to text, but note that MWBP
>        WG be asked to review early working draft of rec-track
>        deliverable.
>        
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-82: Shared use in public spaces and homes
>      PROPOSED: to close without change; this topic has seen
>        extensive discussion in the group, and no new information was
>        supplied in raising the issue that would justify re-opening
>        this question.
>        
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-84: User/consumer education
>      PROPOSED: to close without change.
>      
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-86: Accessibility 
>      PROPOSED: to close without change, but note that there are
>        liaison mechanisms with WAI in place.
>        
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-88: Recommend the use of information
>        architecture and design technologies
>      PROPOSED: to close without change, unless a concrete proposal is
>        made in time for the call.
>      
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-89: Multimodality of indicators
>      PROPOSED: to close; duplicates ISSUE-80
>      
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-93: Multi-platform compatibility
>      PROPOSED: to close without change; would lead to poor restatement
>        of core principles.
>        
>      Subject: Re: ISSUE-94: More f-looking and future-proof?
>      PROPOSED: to close; points a, c, d out of scope; point b covered
>        by ISSUE-87.
> 
> 
> 5. rec-track document update
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/
> 
>    Editor's report: Shawn, where are we?  What's missing? Who's
>    lacking conformance language?
> 
> 
> 6. Self Signed Certificates  (Stephen Farrell)
> 
> 
> 7. BrowserLockDown (Tim Hahn)
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/RecommendationDisplayProposals/BrowserLockDown
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 16:21:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:49 GMT