Re: ISSUE-98: Which kind of logotype should be preferred? [Techniques]

How big do you expect these logos to be displayed? i.e. is the current 16x16
space sufficient, or were you expecting a larger logo to be displayed
somewhere?

On 8/10/07, michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com <
michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Subject logo should be in the primary UI.  It will effectively play the
> role currently assumed by favicons.  Issuer and community logos should
> be available too, but could be relegated to a secondary UI at agent's
> discretion.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:54 AM
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-98: Which kind of logotype should be preferred?
> [Techniques]
>
>
> ISSUE-98: Which kind of logotype should be preferred? [Techniques]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/
>
> Raised by: Thomas Roessler
> On product: Techniques
>
> The PKIX logotype extension describes issuer, community, and subject
> logotypes. Assuming that web user agents display some kind of logotype,
> which one should be picked, and when?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>