W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: ISSUE-60: reinvent Help and DoIt (public comment)

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:00:22 -0400
To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF55A22DD4.D66161E9-ON852572C2.006DE221-852572C2.006DE5AE@LocalDomain>
I think we're good with this one. 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
04/17/2007 08:25 AM
Please respond to
Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>


To
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
cc

Subject
ISSUE-60: reinvent Help and DoIt (public comment)








ISSUE-60: reinvent Help and DoIt (public comment)

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/60

Raised by: Bill Doyle
On product: Note: use cases etc.

>From public comments
raised by: Al Gilman Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable-
authentication/2007Apr/0000.html


reinvent Help and DoIt 
where it says, in 10.1.8 Provide explanations, justifying the advice or 
information given
   If the user is expected to carry out a task or an action to achieve
   the desired level of security, they should have access to an
   explanation that justifies why it is necessary.
Yes, yes, yes.
Where the projection of the security infoset that the WG has nominated 
as "what to present" fails to communicate, and the user can recognize 
this, 
there needs to be built into the *easy* interactive fabric of Rich Web 
content 
a way for them to get more information when they will somehow manage to 
recognize that they care about the decision and don't grasp the info they 
need.  See comment to 10.1.7 for more.
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 20:00:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:47 GMT