W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Semantic Annotations for WSDL document

From: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:09:41 -0400
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Cc: jam@cs.uga.edu, public-ws-semann@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF8B0ECC9A.10D10F6E-ON85257211.0069116E-85257211.0069420C@us.ibm.com>
Hello All,

These editorial changes and the others identified by John have been checked
in.

Regards,
Joel


Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> wrote on 10/16/2006 10:26:57 AM:

> Hi all,
> also thanks to John for the comments.
> I have one suggestion below.
>
> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:55 -0400, Joel Farrell wrote:
> > > All subsections 2.1.1 - 2.1.7 have examples, except
> > > 2.1.5 Complex Types.  Is there a reason?
> > >
> >
> > The section is basically an introduction to the concept of annotating
> > complex types, with the examples in the subsequent sections.
>
> I note that none of the 2.1.x sections puts modelReference on
> complexType as such, this would probably be useful. Also, 2.1.6 puts
> modelReferences on elements within a complex type, but it could also put
> the modelReferences on global elements. So I'd suggest that we move the
> current example from 2.1.6 to 2.1.5, add another modelReference on the
> complexType (or add an example with that), and add new example in 2.1.6
> that puts modelReferences on global elements.
>
> Or do you think it's overkill?
>
> I'll put the whole set of John's comments as a new editorial issue, just
> so that we don't forget it. 8-)
>
> Thanks,
> Jacek
>
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 19:10:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 April 2012 12:14:27 GMT