W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Semantic Annotations for WSDL document

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:26:57 +0200
To: Joel Farrell <joelf@us.ibm.com>
Cc: jam@cs.uga.edu, public-ws-semann@w3.org
Message-Id: <1161008817.32601.163.camel@localhost>

Hi all, 
also thanks to John for the comments.
I have one suggestion below.

On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 14:55 -0400, Joel Farrell wrote:
> > All subsections 2.1.1 - 2.1.7 have examples, except
> > 2.1.5 Complex Types.  Is there a reason?
> > 
> 
> The section is basically an introduction to the concept of annotating
> complex types, with the examples in the subsequent sections.

I note that none of the 2.1.x sections puts modelReference on
complexType as such, this would probably be useful. Also, 2.1.6 puts
modelReferences on elements within a complex type, but it could also put
the modelReferences on global elements. So I'd suggest that we move the
current example from 2.1.6 to 2.1.5, add another modelReference on the
complexType (or add an example with that), and add new example in 2.1.6
that puts modelReferences on global elements. 

Or do you think it's overkill?

I'll put the whole set of John's comments as a new editorial issue, just
so that we don't forget it. 8-)

Thanks,
Jacek
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 14:27:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 April 2012 12:14:27 GMT