- From: Laurent Henocque <laurent.henocque@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 19:13:29 +0200
- To: public-ws-semann@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 section 2 The document currently distinguishes among "simple type" data and "complex type" data, argueing that only in the former case can the annotation be mentioned aside of the data. I think that some complex types may prove sufficiently general to be used in varied semantical concepts. If you think of a "Point" type for instance (having an "x" and a "y"), it may be a coordinate in a geographic information system, or else the location of the upper right corner of a rectangle in a diagram, etc... So I think that in some cases, complex type data can be annotated from the outside, very mutch like simple type data. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEV5M3IF1tz5h+GDARAmfiAJwKTwAC3I32R0DvBInb7y0Dva6FGwCeOrHq JpF3fNsMLCZfQh0gKtC6BZI= =iItn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 19:09:34 UTC