W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > May 2006

Re: issue: why distinguish between basic and complex types?

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:32:05 +0200
To: Laurent Henocque <laurent.henocque@gmail.com>
Cc: public-ws-semann@w3.org
Message-Id: <1147102325.737.13.camel@localhost>

Laurent, this is now logged as issue 11 at [1]. 8-)
Jacek

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x11

On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 19:13 +0200, Laurent Henocque wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> section 2
> 
> The document currently distinguishes among "simple type" data and "complex type" data, argueing that only in the former
> case can the annotation be mentioned aside of the data.
> 
> I think that some complex types may prove sufficiently general to be used in varied semantical concepts. If you think of
> a "Point" type for instance (having an "x" and a "y"), it may be a coordinate in a geographic information system, or
> else the location of the upper right corner of a rectangle in a diagram, etc...
> 
> So I think that in some cases, complex type data can be annotated from the outside, very mutch like simple type data.
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFEV5M3IF1tz5h+GDARAmfiAJwKTwAC3I32R0DvBInb7y0Dva6FGwCeOrHq
> JpF3fNsMLCZfQh0gKtC6BZI=
> =iItn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 15:32:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 April 2012 12:14:27 GMT