- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:32:50 +0200
- To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/13.
Dial-in information (member-only) [1]
Zakim instructions [2]
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-semann/2006Jun/0006
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
----------------------------------------
1. Call setup
- Scribe list: JBD, JL, CB, JF, RA, MK, JH, BP,
LH, TV, NG, TP, CP, CV, LF, HL, EP, BNS, AS
- Regrets: CV, LF
- Any modifications to agenda?
- Especially reordering of issues to be discussed
- Any other business?
----------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes
- Minutes of last meeting [1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060606
----------------------------------------
3. Action Item Review
- Action item list [1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/#Actions
2006-05-23: Terry to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July
2006-05-23: EricP to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July
- ongoing, with time to spare
2006-06-06: JacekK to open 2 issues: relation of multiple model references
(1) and annotationContext (2)
- done, issues 17 and 18 in [2]
2006-06-06: LaurentH to specify use cases for separating different
annotations (for example optimizations) into different
contexts/perspectives
- ongoing?
2006-06-06: JohnMiller to propose a specific RDFS ontology for interface
categories
- ongoing?
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/
----------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
- Face-to-face logistics page [1]
- Registration closed now
- Proposed agenda will be posted soon
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/meetings/200606Galway
----------------------------------------
5. Relation of multiple modelReferences [1]
- Implicit conjunction, no other relationship? [2]
- What do we do about conflicting annotations? [3]
- Can we add a general statement about inconsistencies
resulting in invalid SA-WSDL documents?
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x18
[2] (?) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0043
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0038
----------------------------------------
6. Clarification of SchemaMapping concept [1]
- Summary of what schemaMapping may mean [2]
- Resolved 2006-06-06 that it transforms data
- Direction of transformation (XML<->RDF)
- Both necessary? - upCast and downCast (lifting and lowering?)
- Where can schemaMapping be attached? [3]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x6
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0039
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0018
----------------------------------------
7. should mappings be bijections? [1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x16
----------------------------------------
8. why distinguish between basic and complex types? [1]
- Laurent's suggestion for annotating complex elements where used [2]
- Are there any reason for disallowing any kind of annotation on
simple or complex types/elements [3]? Can we simply "not distinguish"?
- Do the leaf-level annotations imply the container-level relationship? [4]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x11
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0043
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0007
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0009
----------------------------------------
9. Combining multiple modelReferences and schemaMappings [1]
- depends on resolution to issues 6, 18
- what is the relationship between modelReference and schemaMapping? [3]
- we may need the notion of a pair <modelReference/schemaMapping> [2]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x7
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0017
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0021
----------------------------------------
10. Conflict Resolution Rules [1]
- See also thread [2], esp. regarding relation to other issues
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x8
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0022
----------------------------------------
11. modelReference vs. category [1]
- proposal to replace category with modelReference
- adding a small RDFS ontology for category modeling
- waiting for completion of John Miller's action item
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x10
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0059
----------------------------------------
12. Do we need annotationContext? [1]
- Justification for annotationContext?
- Laurent's proposal [2]
- introduce annotationContext with id+author+version+date
- put modelReference into one context
- multiple schemaMappings within modelReference
- Problem with XML Schema element extensibility [4]
- waiting for completion of Laurent's action item
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x17
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0044
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0058
----------------------------------------
13. schemaMapping languages in appendix? [1]
- Any details on possible mapping languages (including examples) should be
out in an appendix.
- Should we plan an appendix (or a few) with details of support for specific
mapping languages? Which ones?
- XSLT
- XQuery
- Others?
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x14
----------------------------------------
14. WSDL 1.1 extensibility? [1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x12
----------------------------------------
15. Interoperation between SAWSDL and UDDI [1]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x19
----------------------------------------
16. Using UDDI taxonomies as examples for interface categorization? [1]
- Is it correctly categorized as editorial?
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x20
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 15:32:58 UTC