W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > October 2010

RE: testing F2F

From: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:43:13 +0000
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
CC: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Message-ID: <503546C5699C1144BDEA0D0DFFE7F88149CFF70D@TK5EX14MBXC119.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
I need that time for all the specs (those that I plan to test).  Part of my concern is the lack of availability of interoperation scenarios. It seems there is very little time between when the interoperation become available and the planned interoperation testing date. Hence, I feel we need to plan conservatively. Thanks.

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Gilbert Pilz
Cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org; Ram Jeyaraman
Subject: Re: testing F2F


While it works for me - I'm concerned about this being pushed out that far.  Ram, will you need that long for all specs or is there one in particular that's going to take longer than the others?

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com<mailto:dug@us.ibm.com>
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com<mailto:gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org>

10/15/2010 02:41 PM

To

Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com<mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>>

cc

"public-ws-resource-access@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>>

Subject

Re: testing F2F







The week of February 14th works for me. Others?

~ gp

On 10/15/2010 10:45 AM, Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
>  I prefer mid to late February 2011. How about meeting F2F during week of Feb 14th or 28th?

Correction: I prefer either mid-February (Feb 14th) or any time after March 7th. Feb 28th wouldn't work.

Thanks.

From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org> [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ram Jeyaraman
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:32 AM
To: Gilbert Pilz; public-ws-resource-access@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Subject: RE: testing F2F

I would need more time than I had thought of earlier to get ready for testing.  I prefer mid to late February 2011. How about meeting F2F during week of Feb 14th or 28th?

Thanks.

From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org> [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gilbert Pilz
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:56 AM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org<mailto:public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Subject: RE: testing F2F

Strike the following message. If I had bothered to consult my schedule I would have notice that I have a conflict during the week of Jan 17th.

So the state of play is that Oracle cannot host the week of Jan 24th. We may be able to host the week of Jan 31th or Feb 7th. If neither of those weeks are acceptable, perhaps someone else could volunteer to host on the week of Jan 24th?

> I had an action item to investigate Oracle's ability to host the next, test oriented, F2F meeting in Redwood Shores. We > can't support the tentative meeting dates, Jan 25-27, as our conference facilities are full that week. We can, however, > support Jan 18-20. At this point I really need to know two things: are people willing/able to meet on these dates and, if > so, how many people might I expect to attend?

~ gp
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 19:43:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:31 GMT