W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > September 2009

Re: WS-Fragment uploaded

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:50:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909241246170.5132@wnl.j3.bet>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Doug Davis wrote:

> All,
>  Ram and I have just checked in ws-frag [1] for the WG's consideration.
> There are still a couple of minor things that need to be cleaned up - like
> fixing up the xsd - there's a list of open questions at the bottom of the
> doc. But we think this is a pretty good starting point.  If the WG
> approves of this direction then we're hoping that it will remove the need
> for the RT spec.

I have a question about the introduction of 'mode' in fragment PUT
mode has three different values:
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Replace
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Insert
and
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Remove

Put+Remove sounds awfully like a Delete, and Put+Insert looks also awfully 
like a Create. (and Put+Replace looks like... a Put)
So why adding another axis of extensibility to duplicate what's already 
there?

>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsfrag.html
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 16:51:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:13 GMT