- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:50:54 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- cc: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Doug Davis wrote:
> All,
> Ram and I have just checked in ws-frag [1] for the WG's consideration.
> There are still a couple of minor things that need to be cleaned up - like
> fixing up the xsd - there's a list of open questions at the bottom of the
> doc. But we think this is a pretty good starting point. If the WG
> approves of this direction then we're hoping that it will remove the need
> for the RT spec.
I have a question about the introduction of 'mode' in fragment PUT
mode has three different values:
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Replace
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Insert
and
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-fra/Modes/Remove
Put+Remove sounds awfully like a Delete, and Put+Insert looks also awfully
like a Create. (and Put+Replace looks like... a Put)
So why adding another axis of extensibility to duplicate what's already
there?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsfrag.html
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 16:51:06 UTC