W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > May 2009

Re: [Bug 6401] Draft proposal of issue 6401

From: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:48:25 -0700
Message-ID: <4A09A859.1060503@oracle.com>
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
CC: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Doug,

I've never like the idea of WSDL+Format ==> implied wire message. One of 
the goals of the original proposal was to leverage existing WSDL tools 
to allow Event Sinks to generate service stubs for Notification 
messages. I know of no existing tool that is capable of consuming a WSDL 
and factoring in something like "wrapped format" to generate the correct 
service stubs.

- gp

On 5/12/2009 6:30 AM, Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Wu,
>   would it be possible for you to produce some sample WSDL (and/or 
> policy if necessary) to show what the metadata would look like when 
> events are wrapped?  Its never been quite clear to me whether or not 
> the formatting information appears in the metadata that describes the 
> events.  For example, let's say there are 5 different Format URIs that 
> an event source supports - would the metadata (wsdl?) need to include 
> all 5 variants for all events that are generated? That seems like a 
> lot of metadata.  Or would the metadata just include the base (raw) 
> version and the definition of the 4 other Format URIs _imply_ what the 
> XML on the wire would look like? I've always thought it was the latter 
> (easier for my simple head to process :-), but I'm pretty sure not 
> everyone would agree.  I think having some concrete examples to look 
> at would help the decision making process.
>
> thanks
> -Doug
> ______________________________________________________
> STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
> The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
>
>
> *"Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com>*
> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
>
> 05/05/2009 05:30 PM
>
> 	
> To
> 	<public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, <member-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
> cc
> 	"Gilbert Pilz" <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>, "Geoff Bullen" 
> <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>, "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com>
> Subject
> 	Re: [Bug 6401] Draft proposal of issue 6401
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Here is our concrete proposal of issue 6401 that was submitted to 6401 
> Task team on 05/04/09.
>  
> It is based on Gil's original proposal with amendments. An overview 
> page is provided to illustrate the approach.
>  
> This proposal should be treated as work in progress. 
> Comments/suggestions/contributions are welcome and appreciated.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> - Wu Chou/Li Li
>  
> Avaya Labs Research   [attachment "6401_proposal_v0.5.pdf" deleted by 
> Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM]


Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 16:49:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:00 GMT