W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > May 2009

Re: [Bug 6401] Draft proposal of issue 6401

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:30:20 -0400
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF3A740C81.11B1840F-ON852575B4.00497AF4-852575B4.004A325C@us.ibm.com>
  would it be possible for you to produce some sample WSDL (and/or policy 
if necessary) to show what the metadata would look like when events are 
wrapped?  Its never been quite clear to me whether or not the formatting 
information appears in the metadata that describes the events.  For 
example, let's say there are 5 different Format URIs that an event source 
supports - would the metadata (wsdl?) need to include all 5 variants for 
all events that are generated? That seems like a lot of metadata.  Or 
would the metadata just include the base (raw) version and the definition 
of the 4 other Format URIs _imply_ what the XML on the wire would look 
like? I've always thought it was the latter (easier for my simple head to 
process :-), but I'm pretty sure not everyone would agree.  I think having 
some concrete examples to look at would help the decision making process.

STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

"Chou, Wu (Wu)" <wuchou@avaya.com> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
05/05/2009 05:30 PM

<public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, <member-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
"Gilbert Pilz" <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>, "Geoff Bullen" 
<Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>, "Li, Li (Li)" <lli5@avaya.com>
Re: [Bug 6401] Draft proposal of issue 6401

Here is our concrete proposal of issue 6401 that was submitted to 6401 
Task team on 05/04/09.
It is based on Gil's original proposal with amendments. An overview page 
is provided to illustrate the approach.
This proposal should be treated as work in progress. 
Comments/suggestions/contributions are welcome and appreciated.
- Wu Chou/Li Li
Avaya Labs Research   [attachment "6401_proposal_v0.5.pdf" deleted by Doug 
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 13:31:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:49 UTC