W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Issue 6413 - just thinking

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
cc: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, Geoff Bullen <Geoff.Bullen@microsoft.com>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905061026550.13024@wnl.j3.bet>
On Wed, 6 May 2009, ashok malhotra wrote:

> Yves:
> Just wondering.  Are you thinking of the fragment spec as similar to the 
> frag-id in URI's?
Yes and no.
Yes as they exist to address a fragment of a resource, no as they are not 
as generic. In the WS case, we already know the data format and partly its 
structure, leading to an a-priori knowledge of how to process those 

> That is quite different.  I don't think the fragment spec we are 
> thinking of will be reusable in other specs.  If people disagree, I 
> would like to see an example of where and how the fragment spec from 
> from WS-RA would be reused.

Well, I heard on the call yesterday that some other groups were trying to 
produce their own fragment spec. This would be the right time and place to 
gather all those requirements and produce something usable by more than 
one group/one spec.

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 14:30:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:49 UTC