W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > December 2009

Re: 8283 discussion

From: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:42:11 -0800
Message-ID: <4B2BF733.5070709@oracle.com>
To: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
Do we need to say anything about what effect generating a fault has on 
the processing of requests? Is it fair to assume that the act of 
generating a fault will halt the processing of the request in who's 
context the fault was generated?

- gp

On 12/15/2009 10:46 AM, Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8283
>
>  
>
> Pursuant to the action I took from last meeting, I suggest adding a 
> definition [1] of  what "generate" means in the context of faults.
>
>  
>
> Thus, to resolve this issue, I suggest:
>
> 1.        Include changes to fault definitions as proposed in the issue.
>
> 2.       Add [1] to the compliance section.
>
>  
>
> Thanks.
>
>  
>
> [1] Add to the compliance section of all WS-RA specifications
>
>  
>
> The term "generate" in used relation to the various faults defined by 
> this specification. This term implies that a fault is produced but 
> does not necessarily imply that it is transmitted.
>


Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 21:44:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:18:16 GMT