Re: issue 6401/6661: combined proposal

Overall I like the flow of this but I tried to remove some extra stuff 
that I think just adds verbosity w/o a good reason and will just lead to 
confusion ( like duplicating what MEX and WSDL already tell us). 
I also removed the unchanged portions of WS-Eventing - to keep it below 
the w3c mailing list size restriction.  :-)



thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.

public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org wrote on 08/24/2009 02:23:32 PM:

> Attached (or inlined as the case may be) is draft 6 of a proposal 
> for issues 6401/6661. This proposal allows for the use of both the 
> EventDescriptions element and Format-specific Notification WSDLs. 
> There are still some open issues with this version of the proposal, 
> but these can be worked out by the WG. Note that, as per our 
> agreement at the last F2F, the section that describes the binding of
> wse:EventDescriptions to a Unwrapped Notification WSDL has been marked 
"TBD".
> 
> Thanks to Ram, Wu, and Li for their help and feedback. Thanks to 
> their input I think we've got something in which the combination of 
> EventDescriptions and Notification WSDLs offers some value beyond 
> merely serving as a political compromise.
> 
> - gp