W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-editors@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ws-t converted file

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:59:45 -0500 (EST)
To: Katy Warr <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com>
cc: public-ws-resource-access-editors@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901290859180.16685@ubzre.j3.bet>

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Katy Warr wrote:

> Hi All
>
> As I don't have cvs access yet, here's ws-transfer converted wst file:

I added it in CVS (and crosses fingers things will progress on having your 
account setup).
>
>
>
> I've changed the order of the terminology sections to match ws-rt.  I
> can't see any problem with this as it doesn't change the content of the
> document - but let me know if anyone disagrees.
>
> 2 questions:
> - wst doesn't have a 'Composable Architecture' section like rt (should I
> add this?)
> - The message/xml snippets don't have line numbers.  Should I add these
> for good practice?
>
> Thanks
> Katy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 13:59:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:19:35 GMT