W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org > May 2010

Re: [Bug 9699] New: Clarify that WS-Addressing support is required

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 19:18:13 -0400
To: public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFDE459B77.7E0E808D-ON85257721.007FF8EE-85257721.00800628@us.ibm.com>
(forwarding)

Antoine,
  thank you for opening this issue.  The WG discussed it today and we 
decided to modify the following sentence in the WSRA specs:
  All messages defined by this specification MUST be sent to a Web service 
that is
  addressable by an EPR (see [WS-Addressing]). 
such that it now says:
  All messages defined by this specification MUST conform to the 
WS-Addressing
  specifications and be sent to a Web service that is addressable by an 
EPR ( see
  [WS-Addressing]).

Please let us know if this addresses your concern to your satisfaction.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



bugzilla@jessica.w3.org 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-notifications-request@w3.org
05/10/2010 03:58 PM

To
public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
cc

Subject
[Bug 9699] New: Clarify that WS-Addressing support is required






http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9699

           Summary: Clarify that WS-Addressing support is required
           Product: WS-Resource Access
           Version: LC
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: All
        AssignedTo: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org
        ReportedBy: antoine.mensch@odonata.fr
         QAContact: public-ws-resource-access-notifications@w3.org


While the specs appear to be written assuming that WS-Addressing must be 
used
in all exchanges, it is never stated explicitly. It could be useful to add 
such
a statement, either in the compliance section or as an additional section 
at
the beginning of the specs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 23:18:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:40:12 UTC