W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org > August 2010

Re: WS-Eventing, WS-MetadataExchange, WS-Event-Description remarks

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:01:39 -0400
To: Stephan Poehlsen <poehlsen@itm.uni-luebeck.de>
Cc: public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF4EB6F1D8.FA6B8C55-ON85257782.006DDDA0-85257782.006E03FE@us.ibm.com>
Stephan,
  please see  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10339
This issue was opened to address your concerns about the unused references 
- we've removed them from the docs and the changes are now available in 
the editor's copy of the specs.  Please confirm your approval of this 
resolution.  And thanks for the review!

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM |  Standards Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.



Stephan Poehlsen <poehlsen@itm.uni-luebeck.de> 
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-comments-request@w3.org
08/10/2010 02:06 AM

To
Bob Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
cc
public-ws-resource-access-comments@w3.org
Subject
Re: WS-Eventing, WS-MetadataExchange, WS-Event-Description remarks






OK, then I am fine with PDF and DOC files.

Another aspect about references: What about informative references that 
are not used in the spec? For example [WS-SecureConversation], 
[WS-Security], [WS-SecurityPolicy] and [WS-Trust] in the WS-Eventing 
spec. They are just listed in the references section (11.2) without any 
citation. Remove them?

Stephan
Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 20:02:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 August 2010 20:02:31 GMT